Chrome Devices stuck in disabled/locked mode |
||||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome OS ver: 59,60 Case: 13654996 Affected devices: Lenovo Thinkpad 11e, RGS NL6, Lenovo N22 Issue description: Device was disabled a few months ago, than it was recovered later but after re-enabling, it is stuck on the locked screen with the return information. The device shows up as Provisioned on the Admin Console Troubleshooting steps taken: 1. Wipe 2. Chrome OS Recovery - The device when powered on, go to the Locked screen and display the return information. The device shows up as Provisioned on the Admin Console; - Wipe or Chrome OS Recovery do not resolve the issue. The device goes to the lock screen after accepting the Terms of Service; - The device sits on the "Determining device configuration" for a bit and goes into Disabled mode displaying the return information; Device details and screen shot of the issue: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0By9xEkAUmm_cYjI3SzliTDJ3cHc Possibly related to b/66268165
,
Oct 9 2017
,
Oct 9 2017
Thanks Jay. Checking with customer. I was not able to reproduce with Lenovo N22 Touch with a test environment.
,
Oct 9 2017
I was given this link in response to my open support ticket. Based on the models it appears it was created in response to my issues. Steps taken: Powerwash OS Recovery Connect to open (non filtered) network. The devices still do not sync.
,
Oct 9 2017
ketakid@ - could you please help with triage?
,
Oct 25 2017
Has there been any progress with this issue?
,
Nov 1 2017
Hi bhthompson@, could you please help to find an owner for this issue? Thank you
,
Nov 3 2017
Thiemo, is this something in your jurisdiction?
,
Nov 6 2017
Not anymore, Bernie. Dropping it into the enterprise triage queue.
,
Nov 6 2017
Igor, please have a look as it might be related to other bugs which you investigated.
,
Nov 8 2017
As far as I can see from images, the device has the serial number LR05EU5T while in admin the checked device has serial number LR04UR93 (the last image). Can the owner check the device serial number in admin console and enable the device there?
,
Nov 9 2017
Hi Igor, apologies for confusion, photo of a serial number LR05EU5T has been taken from a different device - ThinkPad 11e Chromebook 3rd Gen (Yoga/Clamshell). I have added another picture for LR04UR93 (1_1.jpg). ThinkPad 11e has stuck with "Determining device configuration" (2_2.jpg)
,
Nov 15 2017
we have another case (#14069344), where device was not disabled, but deprovisioned and now in a disabled state. Device details: https://drive.google.com/open?id=17EhdI4ElLOk78r4FvFvSgpJHkFJl_oEf Troubleshooting steps tried: - reset the device - try recovery Should we raise a separate bug for this issuse?
,
Dec 4 2017
Customer have mentioned that they are willing to send devices to us and are asking if there is any other way they can help. They have this issue with 12 devices. (Case #13654996)
,
Dec 5 2017
Looks like server is sending down that the device should be in disabled mode. Bin/Dennis, could you have a look at what might happen with them?
,
Dec 5 2017
Have they verified that device is connected to the network? From the description it sounds like device tries to contact DMServer to get the latest configuration and then times out.
,
Dec 5 2017
Yes, they have confirmed devices are connected to the network. We have also asked customer to specifically check if with an unfiltered network after they are Wiped/Recovered.
,
Jan 2 2018
polite ping on this issue. Customer confirmed they tried an unfiltered network after a wipe/recovery.
,
Jan 2 2018
Alright, can we get a serial number of one of the devices that they tried to power up recently (let's say last couple of days)? Then we can track a request from this device in the logs.
,
Jan 4 2018
re:#20 - Serial number of affected chromebook is 4KVV002. Device was online at around 9:13 am PST 01.04.2018
,
Jan 4 2018
Strangely I do not see any request from this device's opaque device ID in our logs. Which may mean that it did not connect to the network (or at least did not connect to DMServer for device state check), or may mean that something more interesting is going on. My next option is adding more logging to the RetrieveDeviceStateOperation code (currently we don't even log the domain of the device) as that would help to narrow this down. [I still have a suspicion that device simply doesn't reach us for whatever reason, as that would explain everything that is seen by the customer]
,
Jan 10 2018
customer have shared two more device serials, there were online on 9th of Jan 2018: LR04UR93 NL6TFQIN151986D7 They were powered off and on several times, starting around 2:30pm PST.
,
Jan 20 2018
FYI update - I just submitted server CL which logs domain and serial number for each matched device in RetrieveDeviceStateOperation. This should be in production the week of Jan 29 when we can confirm whether we are receiving device requests at all on our side.
,
Feb 21 2018
dkalin@, can you please check the devices again? Were there any requests from them recently?
,
Mar 1 2018
Update from customer - Cust restarted 3 devices as requested in the thread All devices restarted on Feb 27th 2018 - Pacific Time - AM. restarted asset 82871 Serial Number: LR05F5y6 10:42 and 10:44 Asset 57443 Serial Number: NL6TFQIN151986D7 10:49 and 10:51 After connecting to wireless re-directed to Locked screen Asset 69013 Serial Number:LR04UR93 10:52 and 10:55 stuck in a loop "determining device configuration"
,
Mar 19 2018
Hi! Any update on this issue?
,
May 8 2018
Just confirming on this case. It's not uncommon for the serial number physically printed on the bottom of a unit to mismatch the serial number a device thinks it is. This often happens when devices are RMAed and returned to customer, the serial number may change at the factory while the case does not. Please confirm you are reporting the serial number pulled from the unit by pressing CTRL+A at the login / disabled screen, not the number printed on the bottom. This sort of mismatch accounts for this kind of confusion often.
,
Aug 3
This bug has an owner, thus, it's been triaged. Changing status to "assigned".
,
Aug 27
For these devices, the root cause has indeed been a mismatch of the serial numbers. We have diagnosed and notified the customer. Please feel free to reactivate if there's still anything left to do.
,
Aug 28
|
||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jayhlee@google.com
, Oct 9 2017