Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
270.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 505794:505895 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966510174703730656
,
Oct 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : IC:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr Revision Result N chromium@505793 245.11 +- 253.793 21 good chromium@505895 268.403 +- 234.857 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966510174703730656 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 15 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 6 2017