Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.8%-296.8% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.top_25_smooth at 506287:506379 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966539899198126720
,
Oct 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 8d5278293ca158a7bcf8d3a919a0082e36378cfc bad_revision : ce099e953eebf2a7244f69695f1b9e602c51a3db If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Metric : thread_other_cpu_time_per_frame/http___m.nytimes.com_ Revision Result N chromium@506286 0.140904 +- 0.00794709 6 good chromium@506329 0.141884 +- 0.00799854 6 good chromium@506350 0.142222 +- 0.00796599 6 good chromium@506359 0.141494 +- 0.00575837 6 good chromium@506371 0.477147 +- 0.0339986 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...m.nytimes.com. thread_times.simple_mobile_sites More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966539899198126720 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966447737064236016
,
Oct 7 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author hajimehoshi@chromium.org === Hi hajimehoshi@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hajime Hoshi Commit : f6af34a1a523e06a8ef371f21469050795924eb5 Date : Wed Oct 04 11:05:48 2017 Subject: Add RendererSchedulerImpl::V8TaskQueue() Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Metric : thread_other_cpu_time_per_frame/http___m.nytimes.com_ Change : 148.62% | 0.197008842145 -> 0.489802673994 Revision Result N chromium@506316 0.197009 +- 0.0304847 6 good chromium@506341 0.195399 +- 0.016735 6 good chromium@506353 0.196857 +- 0.00917059 6 good chromium@506359 0.197456 +- 0.00827861 6 good chromium@506362 0.196093 +- 0.0152721 6 good chromium@506363 0.192192 +- 0.0330208 6 good chromium@506364 0.486796 +- 0.0151485 6 bad <-- chromium@506365 0.489803 +- 0.0378288 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...m.nytimes.com. thread_times.simple_mobile_sites More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966447737064236016 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
,
Oct 11 2017
,
Oct 12 2017
FYI +haraken, +altimin The fix was already reverted, but we're reland it again later.
,
Oct 12 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 5 2017