Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.6%-13.5% regression in system_health.common_mobile at 502156:502459 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966729565033848816
,
Oct 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966729512330834720
,
Oct 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : timeToFirstPaint_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_amazon To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.amazon system_health.common_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966729565033848816 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 282ea833bef8dbf11acfa618d06568a910242c4d bad_revision : 23d21f4a40156461a6369724ed258db966663ea2 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : timeToFirstPaint_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_amazon Revision Result N chromium@502064 797.214 +- 26.3307 6 good chromium@502163 784.22 +- 46.6982 6 good chromium@502213 801.771 +- 59.9965 6 good chromium@502238 776.733 +- 27.9665 6 good chromium@502250 802.113 +- 60.6048 6 good chromium@502252 894.611 +- 59.193 6 bad chromium@502253 892.655 +- 59.0405 6 bad chromium@502256 887.229 +- 71.7496 6 bad chromium@502262 894.46 +- 73.4219 6 bad chromium@502459 896.561 +- 44.8017 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.amazon system_health.common_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966729512330834720 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965828175861531312
,
Oct 13 2017
Trying another bisect but this is going to be quite hard. The metric is very noisy and is hard to tell where it bumped
,
Oct 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_amazon To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.amazon system_health.common_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965828175861531312 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 1 2017
Going to close this as WontFix, as it's not vanishingly unlikely that this regression is going to get fixed a month after the fact. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 3 2017