Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5%-81.5% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 504118:504251 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967136624686536976
,
Sep 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_media/browse_media_flickr_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@504117 103.951 +- 121.424 17 good chromium@504228 111.254 +- 91.0163 20 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.flickr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967136624686536976 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 29 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 29 2017