Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
A zero-to-nonzero to 5% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 498790:501780 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205884527670976
,
Sep 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205754850577232
,
Sep 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205734411687280
,
Sep 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : nednguyen Commit : aca6ca9eacf53d6d12f599ba6b9011951fde2017 Date : Mon Sep 11 16:56:48 2017 Subject: Use --ignore-certificate-errors for webview Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : Optimize:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_cricbuzz Revision Result N chromium@500984 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501011 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501011,catapult@59c0f71abc 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501011,catapult@0ed6f7d08a 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501011,catapult@aca6ca9eac 13.6762 +- 2.30793 6 bad <-- chromium@501012 13.3918 +- 4.00646 6 bad chromium@501013 14.3298 +- 3.42508 6 bad chromium@501015 14.0952 +- 1.21119 6 bad chromium@501018 13.7897 +- 3.7508 6 bad chromium@501024 15.5723 +- 5.45324 6 bad chromium@501037 13.6587 +- 3.58528 6 bad chromium@501089 12.153 +- 13.7566 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cricbuzz v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205884527670976 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : 2eb3c8ac7ffc6840dc07f5e8312576e107eece23 Date : Wed Sep 06 02:01:21 2017 Subject: cc: Flush after every tile task set completes. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter_infinite_scroll Change : 24.67% | 1085.836 -> 1353.66433333 Revision Result N chromium@499747 1085.84 +- 38.3556 6 good chromium@499811 1097.57 +- 87.6778 5 good chromium@499843 1103.72 +- 94.3635 6 good chromium@499844 1079.93 +- 59.8265 6 good chromium@499845 1338.42 +- 45.7342 6 bad <-- chromium@499847 1355.56 +- 81.4108 6 bad chromium@499851 1382.98 +- 106.464 6 bad chromium@499859 1340.97 +- 90.2953 6 bad chromium@499875 1359.18 +- 51.8715 6 bad chromium@500002 1352.28 +- 75.6426 6 bad chromium@500256 1352.8 +- 68.547 6 bad chromium@500764 1343.13 +- 68.6017 6 bad chromium@501780 1353.66 +- 132.374 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205754850577232 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Marja Hölttä Commit : 36d703778ccd0d2777e0d4b69ed6e65e39a9f521 Date : Mon Sep 04 16:05:39 2017 Subject: [parser] Tentatively enable FLAG_preparser_scope_analysis. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Change : 69.50% | 63.1528333333 -> 107.045333333 Revision Result N chromium@498789 63.1528 +- 2.34931 6 good chromium@499537 64.1203 +- 5.7963 6 good chromium@499538 64.074 +- 6.74818 6 good chromium@499538,v8@1c1457fa70 62.4785 +- 3.56451 6 good chromium@499538,v8@36d703778c 92.8853 +- 3.86758 6 bad <-- chromium@499538,v8@7abdadca0e 92.8805 +- 4.71981 6 bad chromium@499539 93.5525 +- 1.8938 6 bad chromium@499540 93.8267 +- 5.36516 6 bad chromium@499543 92.1102 +- 5.04363 6 bad chromium@499549 93.3255 +- 4.3954 6 bad chromium@499561 91.7367 +- 4.83385 6 bad chromium@499584 92.9043 +- 7.66351 6 bad chromium@499631 93.522 +- 5.96469 6 bad chromium@499724 91.0737 +- 5.19825 6 bad chromium@499911 91.3078 +- 6.35872 6 bad chromium@500285 91.6447 +- 9.78215 6 bad chromium@501780 107.045 +- 19.4228 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967205734411687280 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 28 2017