New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 769676 link

Starred by 0 users
Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2017
Cc:
mlippautz@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

39.4%-68.9% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 503670:503718

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@chromium.org, Sep 28 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 28 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=769676

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=8ff5f8268c08362479b7d277fd6016b1e717f0c27f7b4c393be8a5d6f725aa3e


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 28 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_social/browse_social_twitter

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@503669      0.449263 +- 0.479915      21      good
chromium@503709      0.476961 +- 0.325679      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967210182877474384


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 29 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-start_max/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@503634      1.16671 +- 4.49823      21      good
chromium@503736      1.11462 +- 5.39582      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967120471604912592


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 4 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-start_max/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@503620      0.273 +- 0.0930699         21      good
chromium@503790      0.274333 +- 0.0813552      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966669744578279184


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 4 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-start_max/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@503624      1.03662 +- 3.71362      21      good
chromium@503770      0.74581 +- 3.46254      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966669788599980544


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 10 by mlippautz@chromium.org, Dec 19 2017

Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
►

Sign in to add a comment