New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 769633 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Dec 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

44.7% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 504252:504455

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@chromium.org, Sep 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 28 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=769633

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=cf40b65744dcb7e16fc75aa5ead10d2351adef73982b665bcf6952834f3970d4


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@504251      56073078 +- 43978109      21      good
chromium@504455      53526381 +- 32356149      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967223554721779744


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_social/load_social_pinterest

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@504400      37975414 +- 1706395      21      good
chromium@504494      38086263 +- 1781842      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.social.pinterest system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967120515609462768


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 2bb2b389e87e63cf72aadd7a604129b393ba295b
  bad_revision : bf05f2bdfbe8645b6c20af7e013a7555b9fbd06e

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@504402      47.2974 +- 1.01774       6      good
chromium@504448      47.5625 +- 0.57623       6      good
chromium@504471      47.0702 +- 0.256384      6      good
chromium@504493      51.5856 +- 1.4192        6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967120521342230944


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Most regressions also flake on the ref line; lets ignore them. 2 memory regressions left to bisect.

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@504220      59548141 +- 66366513      21      good
chromium@504485      57227478 +- 56935128      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966670083189938576


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@504225      46805322 +- 18873414      21      good
chromium@504480      47634088 +- 29863589      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966670095787711088


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment