Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.8%-7.6% regression in smoothness.tough_animation_cases at 502935:503063 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967443829087278288
,
Sep 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_animation_cases Metric : frame_times/mix_blend_mode_animation_hue.html Revision Result N chromium@502934 20.73 +- 1.04603 21 good chromium@503015 20.8741 +- 1.34228 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=mix.blend.mode.animation.hue.html smoothness.tough_animation_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967443829087278288 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 25 2017