Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.2% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 501653:501751 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionIt's a bit noisy, but the change is significant enough I'm hoping bisect finds something
,
Sep 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967712369622884448
,
Sep 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.canvas Metric : toBlob_duration/toBlob_duration Revision Result N chromium@501652 219.23 +- 17.7806 21 good chromium@501751 218.523 +- 14.0507 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967712369622884448 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 3 2017
Seems to be just a regression of an earlier improvement (@494106). Also the metric has improved since then. Closing it given that and the above no result bisect. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 22 2017