Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.5%-136.3% regression in loading.desktop at 503186:503308 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionGraph linked.
,
Sep 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967725692081203136
,
Sep 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/warm/Free.fr Revision Result N chromium@503231 225.332 +- 44.2557 21 good chromium@503306 224.931 +- 32.3353 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Free.fr loading.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8967725692081203136 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 22 2017