Improve visibility of mis-spelled builder names in EXPERIMENTAL= in tree status |
|||||
Issue descriptionCurrently this case is logged, but the log is not very visible and easy to miss. Some ideas: - Annotate an appropriate buildstep with an appropriate warning - Surface this warning in sherrif-o-matic
,
Sep 21 2017
,
May 31 2018
Hi, this bug has not been updated recently and remains untriaged. Please acknowledge the bug and provide status within two weeks (6/8/2018), or the bug will be closed. Thank you.
,
Jun 4 2018
AFAIK this is still an issue in that there is not very good feedback to sheriffs if the builder name specified in EXPERIMENTAL= is not great. I don't think I will have the time to take this on, so unassigning.
,
Jun 8 2018
Do you know what component this should move to, for triage?
,
Jul 16
I suspect this will be obsoleted before it is fixed, but it belongs to CI.
,
Jul 16
We'll be replacing the entire concept of an EXPERIMENTAL builder in Tree Status in about 2 months. |
|||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||
Comment 1 by davidri...@chromium.org
, Sep 21 2017