Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
44.1% improvement in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 499603:499660 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSuspiciously large improvement, could this be a bug?
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968029900622678720
,
Sep 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/canvas_50000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@499602 10.969 +- 2.57519 21 good chromium@499660 11.0299 +- 4.06071 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=canvas.50000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968029900622678720 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
What ever made this metric super noisy went away. We can close this. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 19 2017