Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 502231:502268 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968030600201820928
,
Sep 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org === Hi rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Devlin Cronin Commit : 282ea833bef8dbf11acfa618d06568a910242c4d Date : Fri Sep 15 14:41:26 2017 Subject: [Extensions Bindings] Remove unused test member event_change_handler_ Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Change : 11.57% | 5380096.0 -> 6002688.0 Revision Result N chromium@502230 5380096 +- 251879 6 good chromium@502249 5524992 +- 306228 6 good chromium@502250 6436523 +- 202445 6 bad <-- chromium@502251 6422187 +- 173939 6 bad chromium@502252 6198272 +- 367683 6 bad chromium@502254 6667264 +- 284355 6 bad chromium@502259 6497280 +- 248138 6 bad chromium@502268 6002688 +- 221392 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968030600201820928 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
Looks like a bad bisect, lets try again.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968021018322069424
,
Sep 19 2017
Also cc-ing perezju: more java heap bisect weirdness :(
,
Sep 19 2017
Yep, definitely not revision 282ea833bef8dbf11acfa618d06568a910242c4d. :)
,
Sep 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968021018322069424 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
One last try.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968012488229880992
,
Sep 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author pdr@chromium.org === Hi pdr@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Philip Rogers Commit : 89301e1190efd4d3ae2f3c1c0348a6d9d75e6477 Date : Thu Sep 14 23:33:06 2017 Subject: Make DataTransfer::DeviceSpaceBounds operate on the entire rect Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Change : 9.57% | 5201237.33333 -> 5698901.33333 Revision Result N chromium@502100 5201237 +- 211444 6 good chromium@502101 6505472 +- 305530 6 bad <-- chromium@502102 6401707 +- 222821 6 bad chromium@502104 6280875 +- 451803 6 bad chromium@502107 6049451 +- 230446 6 bad chromium@502113 5889024 +- 258649 6 bad chromium@502125 5886293 +- 320401 6 bad chromium@502150 5819392 +- 431025 6 bad chromium@502200 5540864 +- 604639 6 bad chromium@502300 5698901 +- 213123 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968012488229880992 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
perezju: java heap not bisecting.
,
Sep 20 2017
,
Sep 20 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 19 2017