Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 501054:501177 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968031337033799632
,
Sep 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Revision Result N chromium@501053 12224925 +- 291934 21 good chromium@501177 12215963 +- 301564 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968031337033799632 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 19 2017