Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
53% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 499653:499765 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968031377057296768
,
Sep 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame/http___jsfiddle.net_rF9Gh_7_show_ Revision Result N chromium@499652 2.82782 +- 2.11519 21 good chromium@499765 2.89134 +- 2.10766 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...jsfiddle.net.rF9Gh.7.show. thread_times.key_silk_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968031377057296768 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
Not sure if this is real, the graph went from being bi-modal to stable.
,
Sep 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968027570263250432
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 19 2017