Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.7% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 501244:501271 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968386720999328656
,
Sep 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_irctc Revision Result N chromium@501243 38161625 +- 1288569 21 good chromium@501271 38282360 +- 1277658 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.irctc system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968386720999328656 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8960842201317144272
,
Dec 7 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jgruber@chromium.org === Hi jgruber@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Jakob Gruber Commit : 150fd5925497793ac421cdf951de8abec0e5cf04 Date : Tue Sep 12 07:12:12 2017 Subject: Revert "Reland "[snapshot] Temporarily enable --lazy-deserialization"" Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news/load_news_irctc Change : 2.19% | 37420021.7778 -> 38238084.0 Revision Result N chromium@501230 37420022 +- 897254 9 good chromium@501230,v8@150fd59254 38081981 +- 1140373 9 bad <-- chromium@501230,v8@745ae2d8d7 38148655 +- 749074 6 bad chromium@501231 38249007 +- 677877 6 bad chromium@501232 38266756 +- 440924 6 bad chromium@501233 38018948 +- 380410 6 bad chromium@501236 38097227 +- 1410048 9 bad chromium@501241 38169476 +- 448086 6 bad chromium@501251 38056665 +- 782421 6 bad chromium@501271 38238084 +- 600054 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.irctc system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8960842201317144272 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 8 2017
Bisects to a revert that has since been relanded, closing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 15 2017