Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
76.9%-128.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 501152:501202 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968403392475755600
,
Sep 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@501155 411.36 +- 429.891 21 good chromium@501178 444.847 +- 278.126 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968403392475755600 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 15 2017
Closing due to flaky benchmark, return to baseline. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 15 2017