All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=765277

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=ee66260faa12116de8c42add63ba5ab642be0c235e7cd15a8f9aabdee99fea1a


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968460644877235888

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@500376      883934 +- 7778628      21      good
chromium@500474      676623 +- 6934455      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968460644877235888


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968454951032453088

(#4 is for wider range 500276-500522)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : xunjieli
  Commit : 724bb776bcdea642a5bc9cc20fe14bb0282b4900
  Date   : Wed Sep 06 14:29:20 2017
  Subject: [Telemetry] Use --ignore-certificate-errors-spki-list to bypass cert errors

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.ogg_type_audio
  Change       : 10.97% | 52932.0 -> 58740.0

Revision                                 Result                  N
chromium@500276                          52932.0 +- 481.065      6      good
chromium@500338                          52968.0 +- 222.495      6      good
chromium@500342                          52720.0 +- 923.974      6      good
chromium@500344                          52717.3 +- 373.252      6      good
chromium@500344,catapult@c5a474f50f      52894.7 +- 477.415      6      good
chromium@500344,catapult@724bb776bc      59156.7 +- 2307.68      6      bad       <--
chromium@500344,catapult@80c47581b1      58806.7 +- 240.644      6      bad
chromium@500344,catapult@4f611510b9      59913.3 +- 3861.26      6      bad
chromium@500344,catapult@442f46edf7      61632.0 +- 13803.8      6      bad
chromium@500345                          61379.3 +- 14069.9      6      bad
chromium@500346                          58700.0 +- 249.351      6      bad
chromium@500354                          61144.0 +- 14022.8      6      bad
chromium@500369                          58868.0 +- 567.577      6      bad
chromium@500399                          58762.7 +- 533.507      6      bad
chromium@500522                          58740.0 +- 433.885      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogg.type.audio media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968454951032453088


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection