Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.6%-207.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 501244:501291 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968559634961631840
,
Sep 13 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author perezju@chromium.org === Hi perezju@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Juan A. Navarro Perez Commit : 59bf3021bcf91a57dd3e3972c9cfcb0c8e83b117 Date : Tue Sep 12 14:58:15 2017 Subject: [tools/perf] Tweak memory.top_10_mobile story flow Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Change : 232.55% | 7798784.0 -> 25934506.6667 Revision Result N chromium@501243 7798784 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501267 7798784 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501273 7798784 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@501274 25625259 +- 11875036 6 bad <-- chromium@501275 21359275 +- 15838151 6 bad chromium@501276 23558144 +- 15119748 6 bad chromium@501279 19113984 +- 14951668 6 bad chromium@501291 25934507 +- 12265447 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968559634961631840 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
Issue 764717 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 15 2017
Issue 765126 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 19 2017
These are expected and make sense as we made some changes to the benchmark logic. The larger regressions are on background, which also makes sense, since before we were loading about:blank before going to background, and we don't anymore.
,
Sep 20 2017
Issue 766602 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 13 2017