Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.9%-32.2% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 499658:499877 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968751190262306656
,
Sep 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame/canvas_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@499657 1.37897 +- 0.474617 21 good chromium@499748 1.35082 +- 0.309703 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=canvas.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968751190262306656 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 12 2017
Looks like a revert and not bisecting so closing as wontfix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 11 2017