Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.3%-529.5% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 500377:500490 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968763119573100832
,
Sep 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : Parse-Background:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard Revision Result N chromium@500394 70.1208 +- 104.894 21 good chromium@500490 67.7797 +- 117.618 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968763119573100832 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 11 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 11 2017