Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
65.1%-75.1% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 499396:499402 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969026758618350864
,
Sep 8 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author bcwhite@chromium.org === Hi bcwhite@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Brian White Commit : 003796b6cd67a5ec5d1dd12577f811719cf4122d Date : Sat Sep 02 18:31:07 2017 Subject: Do histogram validation after every JNI call. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/infinite_scrolling.html Change : 49.07% | 27.6169506434 -> 41.1682110327 Revision Result N chromium@499395 27.617 +- 0.169999 6 good chromium@499399 27.3994 +- 0.821645 6 good chromium@499400 41.0654 +- 2.11388 6 bad <-- chromium@499401 41.1844 +- 0.960196 6 bad chromium@499402 41.1682 +- 3.78931 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=infinite.scrolling.html thread_times.key_silk_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969026758618350864 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 8 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 8 2017