New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 763315 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 95260
Owner: ----
Closed: Sep 2017
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Android , Windows , Chrome , Mac , Fuchsia
Pri: 2
Type: Bug

Blocking:
issue 95260



Sign in to add a comment

<option> does not support CSS cursor values (cursor: pointer)

Reported by vaibhavi...@gmail.com, Sep 8 2017

Issue description

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.113 Safari/537.36
Platform: Windows

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Go to the http://jsfiddle.net/514gg4tk/101/ for demo
2.It will not work for me on chrome browser 

What is the expected behavior?
Expected that when hovering on option value cursor change to the pointer.

What went wrong?
Cursor css not applied for chrome browser

Did this work before? N/A 

Chrome version: 60.0.3112.113 (Official Build) (64-bit) (cohort: Stable)  Channel: n/a
OS Version: 6.1 (Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2)
Flash Version: 26.0.0.151
 
 Issue 763310  has been merged into this issue.
Blocking: 95260
Components: -Blink Blink>Forms>Select Blink>CSS
Labels: Hotlist-Interop OS-Android OS-Fuchsia OS-Linux OS-Mac OS-Windows
Status: Untriaged (was: Unconfirmed)
Summary: <option> does not support CSS cursor values (cursor: pointer) (was: cursor :pointer CSS on select Option hover is not working for chrome ??)
WebKit derived browsers do not support this. Edge and Firefox support this.
Interoperability issue.

Comment 4 by r...@opera.com, Sep 8 2017

In general, :hover doesn't seem to work on options. In Blink you can style e.g. color/background/font-weight for option, but it won't change on :hover.

Comment 5 by r...@opera.com, Sep 8 2017

Similarly, the onmouseover event works on option in Gecko, not in Blink.
Components: -Blink>CSS
Removing Blink>CSS as getComputedStyle has the requested cursor value.

Comment 7 by tkent@chromium.org, Sep 10 2017

Blocking: -95260
Mergedinto: 95260
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

Comment 8 by tkent@chromium.org, Sep 10 2017

Blocking: 95260

Sign in to add a comment