Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4%-210% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 499617:499877 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969101440534579008
,
Sep 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_pinterest_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@499652 21545470 +- 2712417 5 good chromium@499765 43939511 +- 9864299 12 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.pinterest.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969101440534579008 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969082275135897808
,
Sep 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Eric Karl Commit : 6a0f206ccbe0b1e81f53a79f37474a4ba3c760e8 Date : Tue Sep 05 20:05:40 2017 Subject: Use GPU Discardable in Image Decode Cache Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll Change : 166.77% | 19912896.0 -> 53122493.3333 Revision Result N chromium@499652 19912896 +- 8305986 8 good chromium@499709 21677119 +- 1653372 6 good chromium@499723 21846385 +- 4403985 7 good chromium@499724 52246112 +- 11598193 6 bad <-- chromium@499725 54363354 +- 7432423 5 bad chromium@499727 47471139 +- 9823697 6 bad chromium@499730 46839464 +- 49491787 13 bad chromium@499737 50924610 +- 8200835 8 bad chromium@499765 53122493 +- 12713689 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969082275135897808 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 7 2017