Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 498816:499149 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969252318265909552
,
Sep 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Revision Result N chromium@498815 34427534 +- 858568 21 good chromium@499149 34434380 +- 1035689 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969252318265909552 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969179723959262640
,
Sep 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Khushal Commit : 7875d555052d5faeb68ccc586a3be2d183b2c215 Date : Wed Aug 30 19:40:12 2017 Subject: cc: Only checker images required for pending tree activation. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Change : 0.83% | 34202312.0 -> 34486966.2857 Revision Result N chromium@498451 34202312 +- 1250122 14 good chromium@498549 34076907 +- 335371 6 good chromium@498562 34197337 +- 291127 6 good chromium@498568 34176755 +- 201103 6 good chromium@498570 34260417 +- 241878 6 good chromium@498571 34553677 +- 771871 9 bad <-- chromium@498574 34605200 +- 491841 9 bad chromium@498598 34617557 +- 668848 9 bad chromium@498646 34513790 +- 664731 14 bad chromium@498841 34530869 +- 562403 9 bad chromium@499230 34486966 +- 584795 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969179723959262640 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017