Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
967.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 498629:498936 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969253491139657520
,
Sep 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/browse_tech/browse_tech_discourse_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@498628 1595009 +- 4704829 14 good chromium@498936 15352888 +- 24461098 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tech.discourse.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969253491139657520 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 18 2017
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017