Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9%-12.5% regression in smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases at 499269:499384 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255815882821456
,
Sep 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Stroke Shapes Revision Result N chromium@499354 45.8894 +- 8.08259 21 good chromium@499384 45.9807 +- 7.94494 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Stroke.Shapes smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255815882821456 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969251355527512368
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969251352524602768
,
Sep 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Stroke Shapes Revision Result N chromium@499354 46.4794 +- 7.29882 21 good chromium@499384 47.0688 +- 11.567 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Stroke.Shapes smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969251352524602768 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author piman@chromium.org === Hi piman@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Antoine Labour Commit : 148d0597cb0d72a73c3cc2e481396cb6b24cc535 Date : Fri Sep 01 21:00:20 2017 Subject: Create GrGLInterface based on ui/gl's bindings instead of GrGLAssembleGLInterface Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Stroke Shapes Change : 0.70% | 47.6677977707 -> 47.3320110449 Revision Result N chromium@499268 47.6678 +- 2.93926 21 good chromium@499292 47.7692 +- 1.76763 9 good chromium@499293 46.8261 +- 0.359598 6 bad <-- chromium@499294 46.945 +- 3.60503 14 bad chromium@499295 47.0405 +- 3.10495 9 bad chromium@499298 46.605 +- 1.20905 6 bad chromium@499304 46.8513 +- 1.46947 9 bad chromium@499316 46.9311 +- 2.56016 21 bad chromium@499364 47.332 +- 3.72857 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Stroke.Shapes smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969251355527512368 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
The ref build jumps at the same time as the regression. Maybe a change to the test? |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017