Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.6%-734.9% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 498790:499149 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255948984934768
,
Sep 5 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author dtapuska@chromium.org === Hi dtapuska@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Dave Tapuska Commit : 801cc948b453e8e4b4afc1a08d0a83df0e51aa82 Date : Thu Aug 31 14:57:29 2017 Subject: Enable mojo input messages on all platforms other than android. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : first_gesture_scroll_update_latency/Facebook Change : 499.17% | 1.66833333333 -> 9.99622222222 Revision Result N chromium@498827 1.66833 +- 0.19719 9 good chromium@498860 1.62644 +- 0.174626 9 good chromium@498863 3.12944 +- 12.7618 9 good chromium@498864 1.65917 +- 0.133165 6 good chromium@498865 12.8502 +- 8.93785 6 bad <-- chromium@498869 10.2777 +- 11.123 6 bad chromium@498877 9.826 +- 16.9134 6 bad chromium@498893 9.99622 +- 16.0076 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Facebook smoothness.top_25_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255948984934768 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
The bisect is likely wrong for the Nexus device because this feature wasn't enabled for Android at all.
,
Sep 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969247339323226096
,
Sep 6 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author tobiasjs@google.com === Hi tobiasjs@google.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Tobias Sargeant Commit : 416174f07b4d1d930fee687ddd0eae67fbc24ee1 Date : Fri Sep 01 01:18:09 2017 Subject: Disable ScrollTopLeftInterop in WebView. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : frame_times/LinkedIn Change : 1.43% | 16.4808565891 -> 16.7170386989 Revision Result N chromium@498815 16.4809 +- 0.0795109 6 good chromium@498982 16.4731 +- 0.0473365 6 good chromium@499066 16.454 +- 0.101025 6 good chromium@499087 16.486 +- 0.0561013 6 good chromium@499098 16.4634 +- 0.125342 9 good chromium@499100 16.4944 +- 0.0903074 14 good chromium@499101 16.6455 +- 0.553824 14 bad <-- chromium@499103 16.6384 +- 0.473736 9 bad chromium@499108 16.7569 +- 0.0268128 6 bad chromium@499149 16.717 +- 0.211059 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=LinkedIn smoothness.top_25_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969247339323226096 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
Looking at the graphs I think what's happened here is that there was a temporary improvement in the stability of measurements as a result of enabling ScrollTopLeftInterop, which I disabled again, bringing back the old behaviour. There was some secondary regression in the middle of the period between enable and disable. The CL I landed was probably the cause of this regression, but there's nothing that can be done about it, because we can't enable ScrollTopLeftInterop for WebView.
,
Sep 7 2017
Issue 762293 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017