Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.7%-17.9% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 498541:498668 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255966448121312
,
Sep 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : c7a7949c958b4867600ca716968da430fd9b952f Date : Wed Aug 30 22:21:33 2017 Subject: cc: Flush command buffers when all tiles are done. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Metric : mean_input_event_latency/raf_animation.html Change : 16.95% | 14.716 -> 17.2097777778 Revision Result N chromium@498547 14.716 +- 0.89616 9 good chromium@498608 14.7472 +- 0.730439 9 good chromium@498638 14.7433 +- 0.491463 9 good chromium@498639 14.7302 +- 0.322315 6 good chromium@498640 17.6692 +- 2.19907 6 bad <-- chromium@498642 17.567 +- 1.68546 6 bad chromium@498646 17.5778 +- 2.33012 6 bad chromium@498653 17.69 +- 2.22338 6 bad chromium@498668 17.2098 +- 4.04784 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=raf.animation.html scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969255966448121312 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017