Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-1.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 498042:498105 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969256083746947520
,
Sep 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Revision Result N chromium@498041 24330197 +- 758356 21 good chromium@498105 24201856 +- 814589 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969256083746947520 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969171764459389120
,
Sep 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 57c60d68a86bcd9b7dded53d161330b7cd98e5b1 bad_revision : 4c311cf524efe0e8c9c47d8c3d5159846aa005da If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Revision Result N chromium@497852 23894656 +- 946442 21 good chromium@497912 23884220 +- 688575 14 good chromium@497927 23950634 +- 720905 14 good chromium@497931 24286307 +- 1402794 21 bad chromium@497934 24280358 +- 1126797 14 bad chromium@497942 24117983 +- 911719 14 bad chromium@497973 24116813 +- 879880 14 bad chromium@498092 24212193 +- 609736 14 bad chromium@498332 24202538 +- 809583 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969171764459389120 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965361235760886304
,
Oct 18 2017
Kicked a bisect on the narrowed range from #5.
,
Oct 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Change : 0.64% | 21100988.5714 -> 21226989.3333 Suspected Commit Range 2 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/57c60d68a86bcd9b7dded53d161330b7cd98e5b1..a0f1299665254496f8dec21ad41cfa93cad002dd Revision Result N chromium@497927 21100989 +- 102925 14 good chromium@497928 --- --- build failure chromium@497929 21131416 +- 124508 14 bad chromium@497931 21226989 +- 510759 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.intl.taobao.com.group.purchase.html memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965361235760886304 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 8 2018
These recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017