Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
31.8%-38.7% regression in loading.desktop at 496400:496578 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969256428282977360
,
Sep 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/Yandex Revision Result N chromium@496399 99.7344 +- 93.587 21 good chromium@496527 97.2521 +- 89.7633 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Yandex loading.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969256428282977360 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 18 2017
Too noisy to bisect. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 5 2017