New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 762197 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Oct 2017
Cc:
█ briander...@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.4%-40.5% regression in blink_perf.owp_storage at 498363:498638

Project Member Reported by briander...@chromium.org, Sep 5 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 5 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=762197

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=1b867fa6dfe6c69302b3bf6574814aae79fc60825511cf64c125d4510d889966


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11-pro
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 5 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.owp_storage
  Metric       : IDBFactory::open/IDBFactory::open

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@498362      1.67912 +- 0.317905      21      good
chromium@498607      1.7051 +- 0.330037       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.owp_storage

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969256824375732544


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.owp_storage
  Metric       : IDBObjectStore::put/IDBObjectStore::put

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@498509      10.5713 +- 0.646568      21      good
chromium@498638      10.7397 +- 1.2448        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.owp_storage

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969251830265071024


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 6 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.owp_storage
  Metric       : IDBFactory::open/IDBFactory::open

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@498419      1.8295 +- 0.277641       21      good
chromium@498794      1.83532 +- 0.342945      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.owp_storage

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969170877209563040


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 8 by sullivan@chromium.org, Oct 18 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect can't repro.
►

Sign in to add a comment