New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 762178 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Oct 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.3%-22.1% regression in loading.desktop at 498456:498668

Project Member Reported by briander...@chromium.org, Sep 5 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=762178

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=84ce5c7258d49b1563b5402b729ebb59be688f69154c86161f59d1bacf3101f6


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual
win-high-dpi

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/FarsNews

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@498508      838.958 +- 1270.41      21      good
chromium@498605      779.187 +- 130.346      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=FarsNews loading.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969257432994844992


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/FarsNews

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@498507      798.105 +- 862.354      21      good
chromium@498607      764.442 +- 178.893      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=FarsNews loading.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969250549355585584


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : loading.desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/FarsNews

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@498507      992.401 +- 1989.04      21      good
chromium@498607      955.43 +- 822.248       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=FarsNews loading.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969250536843446688


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect can't repro.

Sign in to add a comment