Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
22.1% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 494343:494401 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969913059975417904
,
Aug 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com Revision Result N chromium@494342 260.784 +- 59.3186 21 good chromium@494401 262.402 +- 60.1667 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969913059975417904 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
This benchmark has been removed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 29 2017