Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
147.2% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 494123:495457 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969997817645838576
,
Aug 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max Revision Result N chromium@494122 5.708 +- 1.23127 6 good chromium@495457 13.1545 +- 1.92066 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969997817645838576 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966182151704342480
,
Oct 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966182146496286640
,
Oct 9 2017
Trying a few more bisects.
,
Oct 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max Revision Result N chromium@495450 11.8441 +- 10.4878 21 good chromium@495510 11.8599 +- 9.18384 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966182151704342480 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg Revision Result N chromium@494122 5.02861 +- 0.439016 6 good chromium@495457 9.17461 +- 2.32656 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966182146496286640 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 10 2017
+simonhatch, any ideas what's wrong with the bisect in #8? I'm going to try re-rerunning one more time.
,
Oct 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966106945232767216
,
Oct 10 2017
Think it's hitting the 1 hr no output limit and getting killed. Some thoughts on this: 1. It's alerting on the summary metric I believe, rather than the individual pages, not a big deal but just noticed there's no story filter. 2. It's also happening on mac pro, so I'll kick a Pinpoint job.
,
Oct 10 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/149321b9780000
,
Oct 10 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/149321b9780000
,
Oct 10 2017
Not sure if there's much else we can do here? Really noisy test, can't narrow it down.
,
Oct 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg Revision Result N chromium@494122 4.74489 +- 0.405148 6 good chromium@495457 8.69164 +- 1.21266 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966106945232767216 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 28 2017