Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
194.8% regression in loading.desktop at 496648:496684 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969998253036407760
,
Aug 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/IMDB Revision Result N chromium@496647 267.485 +- 474.657 21 good chromium@496684 256.905 +- 492.2 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=IMDB loading.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8969998253036407760 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/128e4429780000
,
Oct 9 2017
Trying a pinpoint bisect on a wider range.
,
Oct 9 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/128e4429780000
,
Oct 12 2017
Can't repro, on any platform. This is really weird, but there wer a lot of changes around this time, to the recording and the metrics. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 28 2017