Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.9% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 496636:496956 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970001356188972304
,
Aug 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.shadow_dom Metric : v1-large-deep-distribution/v1-large-deep-distribution Revision Result N chromium@496635 29.3788 +- 2.7617 21 good chromium@496956 28.9766 +- 1.48462 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970001356188972304 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
Only on one testcase/bot, bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 28 2017