Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 496662:496726 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970006227964967600
,
Aug 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ Revision Result N chromium@496661 337.874 +- 41.6348 21 good chromium@496726 337.883 +- 51.9664 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970006227964967600 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
This benchmark has been removed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 28 2017