Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
586.5% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 497585:497650 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970008290671901520
,
Aug 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : first_gesture_scroll_update_latency/http___news.yahoo.com Revision Result N chromium@497584 12.2382 +- 31.1737 21 good chromium@497650 14.2351 +- 33.7765 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...news.yahoo.com smoothness.top_25_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970008290671901520 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966194872542179408
,
Oct 9 2017
Weird that bisect can't reproduce; trying a wider range on the other bot this happened on.
,
Oct 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author sahel@chromium.org === Hi sahel@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sahel Sharify Commit : f53825a1fb92e74b9a889b9501243e03de57094d Date : Fri Aug 25 19:16:21 2017 Subject: Wheel scroll latching and async wheel events flags enabled in testing config. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : first_gesture_scroll_update_latency/https___www.google.com_search?q_cats_tbm_isch Change : 187.99% | 4.71477777778 -> 13.5778888889 Revision Result N chromium@497381 4.71478 +- 0.274244 9 good chromium@497451 4.565 +- 0.958569 9 good chromium@497469 4.1945 +- 1.13781 6 good chromium@497478 4.636 +- 0.509865 9 good chromium@497482 4.09067 +- 1.34052 6 good chromium@497483 16.7568 +- 9.52781 6 bad <-- chromium@497484 13.9477 +- 13.5757 6 bad chromium@497486 12.1664 +- 23.5993 14 bad chromium@497520 15.1828 +- 16.5981 9 bad chromium@497659 13.5779 +- 17.2547 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.search.q.cats.tbm.isch smoothness.top_25_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966194872542179408 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 5 2018
sahel: Any update on this bug? This looks like a pretty big regression on smoothness benchmarks. Adding benchmark owner vmiura for guidance.
,
Jan 5 2018
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/849313 fixes the regression. The numbers for smoothness.top_25_smooth/first_gesture_scroll_update_latency are back to what they used to be. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 28 2017