New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 759131 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Merged: issue 750822
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.1% regression in smoothness.tough_webgl_cases at 490111:490259

Project Member Reported by vmi...@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

Issue description

Split from  Issue 750822 .

This regression seems to have recovered and then regressed again.  I'll bisect the 2nd regression.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 25 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=759131

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=fe26fb36c8189da83ca4ccf5900f32ac979e3bd2b6ef40997ff8e8d18884e17b


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-high-dpi
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 25 2017

Cc: k...@chromium.org
Owner: k...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author krb@chromium.org ===

Hi krb@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Kevin Bailey
  Commit : 3cda6c9c7ee5274ea800bce409691a15a949fc2c
  Date   : Thu Aug 03 23:20:18 2017
  Subject: [omnibox] Select-all after revert-all, in more cases

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_webgl_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/http___kenrussell.github.io_webgl-animometer_Animometer_tests_3d_webgl.html
  Change       : 26.34% | 104.801608231 -> 132.403411168

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@491809      104.802 +- 5.32531      6      good
chromium@491869      105.466 +- 4.16666      6      good
chromium@491873      107.086 +- 9.41742      6      good
chromium@491874      137.957 +- 8.38305      6      bad       <--
chromium@491875      139.492 +- 27.3879      6      bad
chromium@491877      132.182 +- 5.02352      6      bad
chromium@491884      131.204 +- 4.84819      6      bad
chromium@491899      129.783 +- 2.84851      6      bad
chromium@491929      132.403 +- 4.2566       6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kenrussell.github.io.webgl.animometer.Animometer.tests.3d.webgl.html smoothness.tough_webgl_cases

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970263741363608688


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 5 by k...@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

Mergedinto: 739303
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 25 2017

Mergedinto: -739303 750822

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Jamie Madill
  Commit : 4c19a8a82b2e93f936ea38c4772ce0182cd3dc2a
  Date   : Wed Jul 26 16:44:57 2017
  Subject: D3D11: Update cached dynamically recompiled programs.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_webgl_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/http___kenrussell.github.io_webgl-animometer_Animometer_tests_3d_webgl.html
  Change       : 22.61% | 98.003223283 -> 120.157851993

Revision                              Result                  N
chromium@490110                       98.0032 +- 5.37071      6      good
chromium@490148                       96.0036 +- 2.82223      6      good
chromium@490153                       98.2001 +- 5.94833      6      good
chromium@490155                       97.6378 +- 4.06187      6      good
chromium@490155,angle@17d270311e      105.298 +- 5.2821       6      good
chromium@490155,angle@4c56c607f4      106.936 +- 3.27885      6      good
chromium@490155,angle@b6664925cb      106.6 +- 3.25921        6      good
chromium@490155,angle@4c19a8a82b      117.826 +- 5.08301      6      bad       <--
chromium@490156                       125.425 +- 5.36761      6      bad
chromium@490158                       122.83 +- 8.05517       6      bad
chromium@490167                       123.212 +- 4.17201      6      bad
chromium@490185                       124.242 +- 5.81671      6      bad
chromium@490259                       120.158 +- 9.35428      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kenrussell.github.io.webgl.animometer.Animometer.tests.3d.webgl.html smoothness.tough_webgl_cases

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970263789552274960


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 7 Deleted

Comment 8 by k...@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

vmiura, please read the comments in  issue 739303 . My change didn't cause a regression; at worst, it's an aliasing issue, and, in any case, a duplicate.

Comment 9 by vmi...@chromium.org, Aug 25 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Got it, sorry for the churn.  Thanks!

Sign in to add a comment