Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
69.3% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.top_25_smooth at 495293:495369 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970449089619153568
,
Aug 23 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author csharrison@chromium.org === Hi csharrison@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Charles Harrison Commit : 007abddf6ad7f7d3f1491217119e3e7166faaace Date : Thu Aug 17 21:39:49 2017 Subject: Testing config: doc.write blocking change on slow connections only Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.top_25_smooth Metric : input_event_latency_discrepancy/ESPN Change : 69.88% | 50.8296777778 -> 86.3482444444 Revision Result N chromium@495292 50.8297 +- 31.3957 9 good chromium@495312 37.8503 +- 15.1961 6 good chromium@495322 50.0696 +- 15.5744 6 good chromium@495325 47.3043 +- 25.8259 6 good chromium@495326 51.1877 +- 12.511 6 good chromium@495327 94.5689 +- 55.8362 6 bad <-- chromium@495331 89.0557 +- 48.5423 6 bad chromium@495369 86.3482 +- 66.3129 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=ESPN smoothness.gpu_rasterization.top_25_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970449089619153568 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 23 2017
Back to normal levels before [1] landed. My guess is that we were blocking resource loads on this page. [1] : https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/7847afc23c816960a019476e995c696143365cac
,
Aug 23 2017
See issue 753794
,
Aug 23 2017
Issue 758275 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 23 2017
Issue 758274 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 25 2017
Issue 758598 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 25 2017
,
Aug 28 2017
Issue 759640 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 28 2017
Issue 759639 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 28 2017
Issue 759638 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 28 2017
Issue 759692 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 29 2017
Issue 759730 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 29 2017
Issue 759643 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 29 2017
Issue 759726 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 29 2017
Issue 759729 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 29 2017
,
Aug 30 2017
Issue 759648 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 8 2017
Issue 758969 has been merged into this issue.
,
Sep 8 2017
Note the latest dupe on issue 758969 comes from a significant battery regression on Android which I don't see as recovered: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=54358387410d141bf5b67fe1079a96add11defa841ef95f022da5a0c786fb196 Latest value is still at about 0.267865 mWh, value before this CL was 0.181317 mWh.
,
Sep 8 2017
Ah, sorry, forget what I said. I've just re-read #4. It's true before that before r489825 the usage was also near 0.26 mWh. So this is indeed back to normal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 23 2017