10% regression in thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame thread_times.tough_compositor_cases NEW_TILINGS 2017-06-28 |
|||||
Issue description
,
Aug 19 2017
,
Aug 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Christopher Cameron Commit : 1894d423068be735560e0171922c833c4091b5d1 Date : Wed Jun 28 06:31:03 2017 Subject: color: Enable color correct rendering by default Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_compositor_cases Metric : thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame/http___jsbin.com_covoqi_1_quiet?NEW_TILINGS Change : 6.89% | 0.514406848365 -> 0.549860826317 Revision Result N chromium@482861 0.514407 +- 0.014739 6 good chromium@482891 0.525458 +- 0.0106535 6 good chromium@482899 0.524574 +- 0.0201665 6 good chromium@482903 0.527782 +- 0.0181151 6 good chromium@482904 0.556453 +- 0.00786616 6 bad <-- chromium@482905 0.544825 +- 0.00796991 6 bad chromium@482906 0.556271 +- 0.00624016 6 bad chromium@482921 0.549861 +- 0.00834412 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...jsbin.com.covoqi.1.quiet.NEW.TILINGS thread_times.tough_compositor_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970870024613860416 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 19 2017
Hey Chris, I know this went in a while ago and we closed other related alerts. I've been making a pass through all GPU thread time regressions that seem to have not recovered. Here are two cases, the first (http://output.jsbin.com/beqojupo/1/quiet?JS_FULL_SCREEN_INVALIDATION) has less noise. The raster task time went up and didn't recover. https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=bb6d70462455e3e7b5571fa9d154cc79a54dbfd6aa3362bfb843cfc9edba3711&start_rev=476959&end_rev=495640 There are no images, this is basically drawing colored rects. Do you know why raster CPU time may have increased?
,
Aug 19 2017
btw, this benchmark is using Software Raster.
,
Aug 19 2017
For an Android device which will always be sRGB, an increase in raster time for solid colors doesn't make much sense. I can take a look to see if anything jumps out at me. While we're in the neighborhood, notice on the graph that there are some much larger regressions over the last year. Do we know what happened there?
,
Aug 20 2017
Re #6: I openend a few issues on Friday. Issue 757134 is the GPU scheduler getting turned on. There seem to be upticks on 07-22 and 08-16 as well which I plan to bisect.
,
Feb 5 2018
|
|||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 19 2017