Performance Audit suggests experimental technologies
Reported by
phoe...@codecombat.com,
Aug 15 2017
|
|
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.90 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Run Perfomance Audit on any page with large non-web images 2. View the audit results 3. See that is suggests to serve images as WebP What is the expected behavior? I expected the suggestion to use the WebP image format to include a note that WebP is experimental and not widely supported at all. What went wrong? The audit results suggest using WebP without any warning that it is not widely supported, leading me to believe that I can simply make this change with little to no negative impact. Did this work before? No Chrome version: 60.0.3112.90 Channel: stable OS Version: OS X 10.11.6 Flash Version:
,
Aug 17 2017
The outcome of the linked issue is the current state of affairs you see in the DevTools panel. WebP suggestions have been split into their own audit (separate bar from optimize images under "Opportunities") so as to enhance filterability. We currently don't have any plans to remove the WebP suggestions, but as luoe@ has stated, we'd welcome any feedback on the criteria for performance opportunities over on the GitHub repo (https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues/new) where the discussion will be a bit more visible to other stakeholders. |
|
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|
Comment 1 by l...@chromium.org
, Aug 16 2017Status: WontFix (was: Unconfirmed)