New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 755297 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Untriaged
Merged: issue 755256
Owner: ----
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

json policy file not working as expected

Reported by microsof...@gmail.com, Aug 14 2017

Issue description

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/54.0

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. create a policy file such as chrome.json
2. place it in the expected folder taken from https://www.chromium.org/administrators/linux-quick-start
3. open google-chrome-stable

What is the expected behavior?
all white-listed sites should open in their own tabs. I have this working on my other machines using google-chrome-stable v 56.0.2924.87-1.  I have not updated to the latest version on the other 21 machines running the exact same OS.

What went wrong?
Chrome opens up in Incognito mode but no other tabs open.  I am using a known-working policy file (attached)

Did this work before? N/A 

Chrome version: 60.0.3112.90-1  Channel: stable
OS Version: 16.04LTS
Flash Version: N/A
 
chrome.json
2.1 KB View Download

Comment 1 by tsepez@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

Labels: Needs-Feedback
Are the other policies still being applied?  If so, this would be a functional issue rather than a security bug per-se.
There are no other policies/policy files in use other than the one I have placed under /etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed.  I am using Openbox, running the browser from /home/<user>/.config/openbox/menu.xml:

-----------------------------------------------------

 <item label="Web browser">
    <action name="Execute"><execute>google-chrome --start-maximized --no-first-run</execute></action>
  </item>

-----------------------------------------------------

...and from /home/<user>/.config/openbox/autostart:

-----------------------------------------------------

google-chrome --start-maximized --no-first-run

-----------------------------------------------------

I have this configuration working on 21 other machines, Chrome installed from the same sources.  I have also verified the permissions on the file/path compared to the boxes that work.  I dunno if I'm doing something wrong, somewhere but at this point I'm stumped.  What other info can I provide?

Thanks for your help!

Comment 3 by tsepez@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

Labels: -Type-Bug-Security -Restrict-View-SecurityTeam -Needs-Feedback Type-Bug
Marking as functional and removing restrictions.
is there a status on this by chance?
Mergedinto: 755256
Status: Duplicate (was: Unconfirmed)
This is a known issue and should be fixed now. Please restart your chrome stable#60.0.3112.90/60.0.3112.101 browser to make it work. The respective server side change has been rolled back.

Thank you!
Well, this is still broken for non-Enterprise browser users like us. Is there a json policy syntax workaround?
This is till broken in linux after updating to 60.0.3112.113-1.  Per https://www.chromium.org/administrators/linux-quick-start I set up the most basic json policy file with the code:

{
  "HomepageLocation": "www.chromium.org"
}

The browser does not behave as expected.
This is till broken in linux after updating to 60.0.3112.113-1.  Per https://www.chromium.org/administrators/linux-quick-start I set up the most basic json policy file with the code:

{
  "HomepageLocation": "www.chromium.org"
}

The browser does not behave as expected.

Comment 9 by jam@chromium.org, Aug 24 2017

Status: Untriaged (was: Duplicate)
This is a different bug from 755256 (the one was just about url blacklist/whitelists not working and the experiment is now disabled in m60)
Status check?
Status check?
Components: Enterprise
Cc: tnagel@chromium.org isandrk@chromium.org
Hey Thiemo, would you know anything about the .json policy files? I vaguely remember something about that.
Labels: Enterprise-Triaged
Ivan, the link in the original report explains it. Do you have a specific question?
Status check?
Cc: -tnagel@chromium.org
Status check? We are rolling out more kiosk machines using Ubuntu 18.04LTS and would really like this fixed please.

Sign in to add a comment