(Kind of similar to issue 753934 / discussion inhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34136 , but issue 753934 is about base::debug::Alias(). Also, it's about debug builds, where we expect this to currently work FWIU.)

This is a debug build, so I doubt those are related. The fix for issue 753934 is in the instcombine optimization pass, so it won't fix this, unless we always compile this file with optimizations.

There's nothing obviously special about the code in question. I wonder if this is /debug:fastlink related.

Also more examples: I put a breakpoint in NavigationRequest::CreateBrowserInitiated and can't see many variables like browser_initiated, request_body, is_form_submission, browser_initiated. VS just says "Error reading register value".

I think there are multiple issues here, but here's a reduced repro for the first one |cookie_line|.

// cookies.cpp
// clang-cl.exe -m32 /Od /Z7 /MDd /GR- /c cookies.cpp /Focookies.obj
// link /debug cookies.obj /out:cookies.exe
#include <string>

std::string foo() {
  std::string bar;
  std::string baz;
  bar = "hello";
  bar += baz;
  return bar;
}

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
  std::string line = foo();
  return 0;
}

Note that /debug:fastlink is not required.

In this case, MSVC debugger says that |bar| is optimized away, but it happily displays |baz|.  This is interesting since |bar| would have NRVO applied to it if optimizations were on, but looking at the generated code you can see that we correctly don't apply NRVO (since we specified /Od).

I'm pretty sure we do apply NRVO in that example, and that's what's up. That happens in clang regardless of mid-level optimization level.

I was looking at a similar case:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

std::string debugfail() {
  std::string x;
  std::string input;
  for (;;) {
    std::cin >> input;
    if (input == "done") break;
    // if (input == "last") return input;
    x += input;
  }
  return x;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
  std::cout << debugfail() << std::endl;
  return 0;
}

As rnk suspected, if I defeat NRVO by removing the comment markers from the alternative return path, both x and input can be viewed in the debugger. For the code as given above (with the alternate return commented out), this is what the relevant part of the PDB looks like:

      52 | S_GPROC32 [size = 52] `debugfail`
           parent = 0, end = 172, addr = 0001:40960, code size = 209
           type = `0x1002 (std::basic_string<char, std::cha...)`, debug start = 0, debug end = 0, flags = none
     104 | S_LOCAL [size = 16] `input`
           type=0x1000 (std::basic_string<char, std::cha...), flags = none
     120 | S_DEFRANGE_REGISTER_REL [size = 20]
           register = 335, base ptr = 96, offset in parent = 0, has spilled udt = false
           range = [0001:40985,+184), gaps =
     140 | S_LOCAL [size = 12] `x`
           type=0x1000 (std::basic_string<char, std::cha...), flags = none
     152 | S_DEFRANGE_REGISTER_REL [size = 20]
           register = 330, base ptr = 0, offset in parent = 0, has spilled udt = false
           range = [0001:40990,+5), gaps =

This encodes input relative to rsp, and x relative to rcx. I suspect the reason we can't view x in the debugger is that the range is really narrow.

Looking at the disassembly, there are a couple of different ways we could describe the location of x. Here, we have chosen rcx+0, but we could have chosen rsp+0x50, which is valid for a much larger range.

I got x to display in the debugger by hex-editing the pdb so that it now reads

     140 | S_LOCAL [size = 12] `x`
           type=0x1000 (std::basic_string<char, std::cha...), flags = none
     152 | S_DEFRANGE_REGISTER_REL [size = 20]
           register = 335, base ptr = 80, offset in parent = 0, has spilled udt = false
           range = [0001:40990,+179), gaps =

We really should be outtputing S_BPREL32 instead of S_LOCAL + S_DEFRANGE_REGISTER_REL.

This is the NRVO bug. S_BPREPL32 won't fix this. There is no way in CodeView to express where clang puts the variable. We'll have to pretend it's a 'std::string&' that refers to the return value instead.

I landed a fix for this in LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/rL312034. Once we do a Clang roll with that, this should be fixed for Chromium.

The roll has landed.

jam & inglorion: can you verify whether this is good now?

Ping?

Using Chromium #503270 with https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/675867 patched in (though that one shouldn't affect this bug), and building with:

is_clang = true
is_debug = true
target_cpu = "x86"
use_goma = true
enable_nacl = false

breaking in and stepping through CookieStore::BuildCookieLine(const std::vector<CanonicalCookie*>& cookies) with Visual Studio, all locals look good including cookie_line.

Thanks, I've verified this.