Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5239% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 492246:492248 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971563596468564880
,
Aug 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest Revision Result N chromium@492245 0.661476 +- 3.62315 21 good chromium@492248 0.650905 +- 3.6543 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971563596468564880 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 11 2017
No repro, regression disappeared. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 11 2017