Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 492372:492461 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643801619870624
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.ebay.com Revision Result N chromium@492371 55.9506 +- 6.70089 21 good chromium@492461 56.6445 +- 4.17051 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.ebay.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643801619870624 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 10 2017
,
Sep 18 2017
This benchmark has been turned down. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 10 2017