Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
324.1%-644.2% regression in smoothness.tough_canvas_cases at 464557:464655 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643918931717648
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Metric : frame_times/tough_canvas_cases_canvas2d_balls_common_bouncing_balls.html?ball_image_with_shadow_back_image Revision Result N chromium@464556 478.141 +- 465.275 21 good chromium@464655 483.491 +- 321.413 19 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tough.canvas.cases.canvas2d.balls.common.bouncing.balls.html.ball.image.with.shadow.back.image smoothness.tough_canvas_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643918931717648 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 10 2017
,
Sep 18 2017
Bisect can't repro, and this went back down (graph that didn't go down only shows ref build) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 10 2017