Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
30.1% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 491730:491809 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643988344021312
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : css_animation:power_avg/browse_news/browse_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@491729 16.2916 +- 3.23782 21 good chromium@491809 16.0544 +- 4.70648 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.nytimes system_health.common_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971643988344021312 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 15 2017
The refs move in parallel. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 10 2017